Những nàng công chúa Disney

trả lời câu hỏi này

Những nàng công chúa Disney Câu Hỏi

What do bạn guys have to say about this?

Steve Hulett wrote:
While wandering the halls of the hat building yesterday, I chanced on one of the traditional animators working there. He said:

"We're developing a bunch of different projects to hiển thị John Lasseter. It's a complicated process. We pitch to a development group, they tell us which ones they like, then tell us that people who're pitching need to develop three pitches for John, since he likes artists hiển thị him three things. And when we do pitch, it's made clear to us that the stories aren't necessarily for a hand-drawn project. When we've brought it up with John Lasseter, he's shied away from committing to a hand-drawn feature..."

This is a turn-around from a few years ago, when the idea was to have hand-drawn features created in Burbank, and the CG features produced at Emeryville.

My thought is: John Lasseter is a smart man. He likes hand-drawn but he recognizes they way the wind is blowing. The Princess and the Frog grossed $300 million globally; Công chúa tóc mây grossed twice that. When the gap is so wide, it's an easy corporate decision to say: "We're going with CGI."

Ron Clements and John Musker are developing a hand-drawn feature that, if what I've been shown holds up, will look one hell of a lot different from hiển thị White. The scuttlebutt I've heard indicates that Mr. Lasseter isn't as keen on greenlighting hand-drawn epics as he was a few years ago. But who inside Diz Co. could blame him? thêm than overseeing hand-drawn animation, John Lasseter wants to win. And he's probably made the judgment that creating hand-drawn features isn't a winning corporate strategy.

Even so, I was disheartened to read this from Mr. Kousac down below:

"Thankfully, no "hand drawn" hoạt hình are in the work at Disney for the foreseeable future. Looking phía trước, chuyển tiếp to seeing the Disney artists take hold of their new digital tools."

Sorry, Mr. Kousac. bạn can be as glad as bạn like Disney hasn't got any hand-drawn features on its "to do" list. But I think
What do bạn guys have to say about this?
*
I'm devastated and speechless. *Silence.* Okay, I found words. The world is ending! Hnad drawn phim hoạt hình is so beautiful and classic. Cgi is wonderful in it's own way, but I would be blown away to see another hand drawn movie. :'( Sorry for my insane emotional state.
MalloMar posted hơn một năm qua
 ARIEL-RAPUNZEL posted hơn một năm qua
next question »

Những nàng công chúa Disney Các Câu Trả Lời

DsnyPrincess said:
That makes me so upset personally I prefer the hand drawn over the CGI. I think their crazy!
 select as best answer
posted hơn một năm qua 
chesire said:
:(
 select as best answer
posted hơn một năm qua 
hajirah4 said:
First of all, bạn jimmy-jacking idiots,(this being pointed to the animators that specifically think that Công chúa tóc mây grossed thêm because it was CGI, which in my perspective, doesn't make sense.) need to learn that kids don't care. Do bạn know that they don't even know that CGI is phim hoạt hình except it's made bởi computer technology,to get it done a bit faster. Do y bạn even know that they don't care about the title? Even if a boy at first thought,

''Oh this movie is probably about a lame princess kissing a frog, I won't watch it!",

he would look at the hilarity and awesome moments with Lottie and want to watch it. Just because kids are senseless that doesn't mean that they're dumb. I hate Flo Rida but that doesn't mean that I hate Wreck -it- Ralph. If kids like the trailer (plot) then they'll watch it. SImple as that.

Second, reasons that P.A.T.F (not the Pittsburg AIDS Task Force, Tiana's movie.) might have gotten such low money on the box office may have been either because the trailer was horrible and bạn didn't explain the plot properly so they didn't watch it, bạn didn't put the movie in thêm large countries like for e.x.p: Greece, hoặc the critiques hated it. People treat critiques as if it's either a coupon so bạn can save money from movie tickets, hoặc they treat it like they're Channing Tatum. Why did they hate it? Maybe because of the some-what bad tình yêu chemistry hoặc it's some racist garbage. I personally hate the tình yêu chemistry. They fell in tình yêu through dancing and hát in a green pond.
Literally. Then the tiếp theo romance is Naveen as a frog giving a ring to Tiana. Please. That had no chemistry at all. Atleast put in another problem. Even though I may be wrong about the chemistry, but I can't be wrong about my reasons of why P.A.T.F. grossed a bit low. Công chúa tóc mây had Flynn and Rapunzel facing thêm problems, she even saved a LIFE. All this chemistry compared to Tangled, just doesn't seem right. However, I still tình yêu P.A.T.F just A LITTLE thêm than Tangled.

And THAT is my rant on them. To make it short, Công chúa tóc mây wasn't higher because it was CGI. It was because of the full plot.
 select as best answer
First of all, bạn jimmy-jacking idiots,(this being pointed to the animators that specifically think that Công chúa tóc mây grossed thêm because it was CGI, which in my perspective, doesn't make sense.) need to learn that kids don't care. Do bạn know that they don't even know that CGI is phim hoạt hình except it's made bởi computer technology,to get it done a bit faster. Do y bạn even know that they don't care about the title? Even if a boy at first thought, ''Oh this movie is probably about a lame princess kissing a frog, I won't watch it!", he would look at the hilarity and awesome moments with Lottie and want to watch it. Just because kids are senseless that doesn't mean that they're dumb. I hate Flo Rida but that doesn't mean that I hate Wreck -it- Ralph. If kids like the trailer (plot) then they'll watch it. SImple as that. Second, reasons that P.A.T.F (not the Pittsburg AIDS Task Force, Tiana's movie.) might have gotten such low money on the box office may have been either because the trailer was horrible and bạn didn't explain the plot properly so they didn't watch it, bạn didn't put the movie in thêm large countries like for e.x.p: Greece, hoặc the critiques hated it. People treat critiques as if it's either a coupon so bạn can save money from movie tickets, hoặc they treat it like they're Channing Tatum. Why did they hate it? Maybe because of the some-what bad tình yêu chemistry hoặc it's some racist garbage. I personally hate the tình yêu chemistry. They fell in tình yêu through dancing and hát in a green pond. Literally. Then the tiếp theo romance is Naveen as a frog giving a ring to Tiana. Please. That had no chemistry at all. Atleast put in another problem. Even though I may be wrong about the chemistry, but I can't be wrong about my reasons of why P.A.T.F. grossed a bit low. Công chúa tóc mây had Flynn and Rapunzel facing thêm problems, she even saved a LIFE. All this chemistry compared to Tangled, just doesn't seem right. However, I still tình yêu P.A.T.F just A LITTLE thêm than Tangled. And THAT is my rant on them. To make it short, Công chúa tóc mây wasn't higher because it was CGI. It was because of the full plot.
posted hơn một năm qua 
*
First of all bạn need to control your bad temper.
ARIEL-RAPUNZEL posted hơn một năm qua
Hiding 9 comments... click to show.
*
I'm not the only one who LOVES Tiana and thinks Princess and the frog is slightly better than Tangled?
MalloMar posted hơn một năm qua
*
@MalloMar, yes, bạn aren't :)
hajirah4 posted hơn một năm qua
fahmad27 said:
Those people at DIsney are being such wimps! Công chúa tóc mây did better because it had a better plot and better romance; NOT because it was CGI! Please keep hand-drawn phim hoạt hình alive at Disney!!! Hand-drawn phim hoạt hình has something that CGI doesn't have: beautiful humans!

Seriously, I can't stand watching CGI phim chiếu rạp (especially in the late 90s and beyond) because all the human characters look (in the hyena's voices) "UUUUU-GLY!" They look hideous; they look like robots hoặc those creepy búp bê that use to scare my sister's childhood friend!
Even back in the 90s I had problem with this. When Toy Story 2 came out, my brother complained that Al and Andy's mom are the only ones that actually look human. Young Andy and Baby Molly look like robots.
Every human in Shrek hoặc any piece bởi Dreamworks look scary as heck!

The only CGI movie that have attractive-looking human characters are Despicable Me, the Incredibles, Ratatouille, Brave, Toy Story 3, Tangled, and maybe Bolt. I haven't seen Wreck It Ralph yet but from the trailers, everybody looks appealing to look at.
select as best answer
posted hơn một năm qua 
*
THANK YOU!!! That's what I'M trying to say,but apparently EVERYONE is getting the wrong idea for some reason. Everyone is appealing in Wreck-it Ralph actually, especially Captain Coulhoun. hoặc however her name is spelled.
hajirah4 posted hơn một năm qua
*
"Tangled did better because it had a better plot and better romance" - THIS. Absolutely, It has nothing to do with the medium hoặc phim hoạt hình style chosen for the movie, it's about whether hoặc not the animators/writers/directors manage to convey enough magic and uplifting and inspirational messages in the final product. Personally, I think PATF did very well considering all the numerous and major flaws of the plot, I still tình yêu the movie regardless of them though but I'm not a người hâm mộ of the way certain aspects and storylines of it (especially romance) were developed.
maryksand posted hơn một năm qua
Swanpride said:
Though the short they displayed before Wreck-it-Ralph apparently is made with CGI, but looks like handdrawn...if they manage to do that at one point, I won't complain (much). It's thêm about how the movie looks like than about how it was made.
select as best answer
posted hơn một năm qua 
Jessikaroo said:
I think that's a bit unfair :o PatF grossed less than Công chúa tóc mây because it was a mess (though I do tình yêu it). Công chúa tóc mây was better planned, had thêm tim, trái tim and was made because they wanted to really make it. Stupid animators...
 select as best answer
posted hơn một năm qua 
*
this has nothing to do with the animators. do bạn know how happy they were, when they heard that patf would be handdrawn? many of them tình yêu it, but the bosses of Disney just dont get enough money down their throats ( for their own taste, practially milking young girls and boys parents isnt enough as it seems)
Safira-09 posted hơn một năm qua
*
@Safira-09 -Yes, but what is the point? WHY are they so happy? IN the end, they didn't even gross as much money. And how can CGI make one movie get so much thêm money? It doesn't matter whether it's CGI hoặc not. How does the phim hoạt hình type effect the box office?
hajirah4 posted hơn một năm qua
Elemental-Aura said:
Are they nuts?! THAT'S IT!!!

Who has a time machine! Somebody needs to go back back and bring Walt Disney himself back here and let him know what the heck people are doing to his dreams!

He might've been open minded of the CGI phim chiếu rạp and might tình yêu Tangled, all the Pixar and all the other Disney CGI movies. But replacing the future of all Disney phim chiếu rạp to CGI phim chiếu rạp is not on. Walt Disney would wanted both to co-exist with each other. Not get rid of the old bring in the new.

2D hand drawn phim hoạt hình is what made Disney. I don't want everything my hero worked for his entire life to be replaced, pushed aside and forgotten...
select as best answer
posted hơn một năm qua 
*
bạn đã đưa ý kiến it. I'm devastated. :(
MalloMar posted hơn một năm qua
*
Yes, in fact Walt Disney actually invented the multiplane camera, which was made for HAND ANIMATION.
hajirah4 posted hơn một năm qua
next question »
Cookies help us bring you Fanpop. By using Fanpop, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More Got It!