quần vợt Agassi's better than Sampras...

kevinkchew posted on Mar 10, 2007 at 12:14AM
...because he won on every surface. Sampras is overrated. Anyone agree or disagree?

quần vợt 6 các câu trả lời

Click here to write a response...
hơn một năm qua hapaganthae said…
Disagree strongly. Sampras owned not only because of his brilliance but because of his versatility. Pete Sampras is the best Tennis player of all time, agassi isn't even in the top ten.
hơn một năm qua dave said…
Yeah Kevin, I'd have to agree, Agassi was good and I loved him as a player, but Pete was better. Head-to-head Pete beat out Andre 20-14. Andre never dominated the sport the way Pete did. What I'm curious about is whether Pete is better than Roger Federer who I think could be the best player of all time.
last edited hơn một năm qua
hơn một năm qua dusty said…
Sampras was better than Agassi it is true. Agassi could be a top ten player of all time. He did win each of the majors, and had 8 slams overall. I'm with Dave when he says that Federer could be the best of all time. He hasn't won the French yet (Sampras never did either), but once he does he will be the best.
last edited hơn một năm qua
hơn một năm qua thesimpleleaf said…
I think Agassi has more raw talent than Sampras. Besides, he's a lot more fun to watch in my opinion.
hơn một năm qua dusty said…
Agassi was WAY more fun to watch than Sampras. Pete could bore you to death.
hơn một năm qua kevinkchew said…
agassi's not even in the top 10?? that's just offensive. federer is/will be the greatest of all time. he makes everyone look foolish.